Search for: All records

Recycling underutilized resources from food waste (FW) to agriculture through hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) has been proposed to promote a circular economy (CE) in food-energy-water (FEW) nexus. However, most HTC studies on FW were conducted at laboratory scale, and little is known on the efficacy and feasibility of field application of HTC products from FW, i.e. the aqueous phrase (AP) and solid hydrochar (HC), to support agriculture production. An integrated pilot-scale HTC system was established to investigate practical HTC reaction conditions treating FW. A peak temperature of 180 ◦C at a residence time of 60 min with 3 times AP recirculation were recommended as optimal HTC conditions to achieve efficient recovery of nutrients, and desirable AP and HC properties for agriculture application. Dilution of the raw AP and composting of the fresh HC are necessary as post-treatments to eliminate potential phytotoxicity. Applying properly diluted AP and the composted HC significantly improved plant growth and nutrient availability in both greenhouse and field trials, which were comparable to commercial chemical fertilizer and soil amendment. The HTC of FW followed with agricultural application of the products yielded net negative carbon emission of 􀀀 0.28 t CO2e t􀀀 1, which was much lower than the other alternatives of FW treatments. Economic profit could be potentially achieved by valorization of the AP as liquid fertilizer and HC as soil amendment. Our study provides solid evidences demonstrating the technical and economic feasibility of recycling FW to agriculture through HTC as a promising CE strategy to sustain the FEW nexus. 

This was a conference presentation. The presentation included an overview about the benthic toxic mats, research objectives of this project and the modeling framework. 

Several treatment plants were sampled for raw influent, primary clarifier sludge, return activated sludge (RAS), and anaerobically digested sludge throughout nine weeks during the summer of the COVID-19 pandemic. Primary clarifier sludge had a significantly higher number of SARS-CoV-2 gene copy number per liter (GC/L) than other sludge samples, within a range from 1.0x105 to 1.0x106 GC/L. Gene copy numbers in raw influent significantly correlated with gene copy numbers in RAS in Silver Creek (p-value = 0.007, R2 = 0.681) and East Canyon (p-value = 0.009, R2 = 0.775) WRFs; both of which lack primary clarifiers or industrial pretreatment processes. This data indicates that SARS-CoV-2 gene copies tend to partition into primary clarifier sludges, at which point a significant portion of them are removed through sedimentation. Furthermore, it was found that East Canyon WRF gene copy numbers in influent were a significant predictor of daily cases (p-value = 0.0322, R2 = 0.561), and gene copy numbers in RAS were a significant predictor of weekly cases (p-value = 0.0597, R2 = 0.449). However, gene copy numbers found in primary sludge samples from other plants significantly predicted the number of COVID-19 cases for the following week (t = 2.279) and the week after that (t = 2.122). These data indicate that SARS-CoV-2 extracted from WRF biosolids may better suit epidemiological monitoring that exhibits a time lag. It also supports the observation that primary sludge removes a significant portion of SARS-CoV-2 marker genes. In its absence, RAS can also be used to predict the number of COVID-19 cases due to direct flow through from influent. This research represents the first of its kind to thoroughly examine SARS-CoV-2 gene copy numbers in biosolids throughout the wastewater treatment process and the relationship between primary, return activated, and anaerobically digested sludge and reported positive COVID-19 cases.